Newtonianism in early Enlightenment Germany, c. 1720 to 1750: metaphysics and the critique of dogmatic philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):471-491 (2004)
The acceptance of Newton’s ideas and Newtonianism in the early German Enlightenment is usually described as hesitant and slow. Two reasons help to explain this phenomenon. One is that those who might have adopted Newtonian arguments were critics of Wolffianism. These critics, however, drew on indigenous currents of thought, pre-dating the reception of Newton in Germany and independent of Newtonian science. The other reason is that the controversies between Wolffians and their critics focused on metaphysics. Newton’s reputation, however, was that of a mathematician, and one point, on which Wolffians and their opponents agreed, was that mathematics was of no use in the solution of metaphysical questions. The appeal to Newton as an authority in metaphysics, it was argued, was the fault of Newton’s over-zealous disciples in Britain, who tried to transform him from a mathematician into the author of a general philosophical system. It is often argued that the Berlin Academy after 1743 included a Newtonian group, but even there the reception of Newtonianism was selective. Philosophers such as Leonhard Euler were also reluctant to be labelled ‘Newtonians’, because this implied a dogmatic belief in Newton’s ideas. Only after the mid-eighteenth century is ‘Newtonianism’ increasingly accepted in the sense of a philosophical system.Author Keywords: Natural philosophy; Mathematics; Metaphysics; Isaac Newton; Newtonianism; German Enlightenment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Samuel Clarke (2007). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Robert Boyle (1999). A Free Enquiry Into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature. Dialogue 38 (4):894-895.
Peter Harrison (2002). Voluntarism and Early Modern Science. History of Science 40 (1):63-89.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Patrick Riley (1972). The Political Writings of Leibniz. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1972). The Political Writings of Leibniz. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Marius Stan (2013). Kant's Third Law of Mechanics: The Long Shadow of Leibniz. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):493-504.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Challenge to Philosophy: A Programmatic Essay. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):101-128.
Michael J. Olson (2015). The Camera Obscura and the Nature of the Soul: On a Tension Between the Mechanics of Sensation and the Metaphysics of the Soul. Intellectual History Review 25 (3):279-291.
Similar books and articles
Harold Mah (2003). Enlightenment Phantasies: Cultural Identity in France and Germany, 1750-1914. Cornell University Press.
John Redwood (1976). Reason, Ridicule, and Religion: The Age of Enlightenment in England, 1660-1750. Harvard University Press.
Eric Schliesser, Hume's Newtonianism and Anti-Newtonianism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Brian Young (2004). Newtonianism and the Enthusiasm of Enlightenment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):645-663.
T. J. Hochstrasser (2000). Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
T. J. Hochstrasser & Peter Schröder (eds.) (2003). Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in Early Enlightenment. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
He Lai (2008). “形而上学批判”与“形上维度的拯救” - 论马克思哲学与形而上学关系的两个基本向度. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:351-382.
Peter Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel I: In the Kantian Wake. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):385-397.
Charles Wolfe & David Gilad (2011). The Self-Fashioning of French Newtonianism. Metascience 20 (3):573-576.
Konrad Fuchs (1976). The Development of Academic Policy in Germany 1750–1914. Philosophy and History 9 (1):95-96.
Jonathan I. Israel (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Ahnert (2006). Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. University of Rochester Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1990). Hegel's Critique of the Enlightenment. Review of Metaphysics 44 (1):146-148.
Neven Leddy & Avi Lifschitz (eds.) (2009). Epicurus in the Enlightenment. Voltaire Foundation.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads17 ( #217,132 of 1,907,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?