Epoché 12 (1):137-155 (2007)
|Abstract||Many critics have attempted to give an account of a gendered incarnation of Dasein in response to Heidegger’s “neutral” or “asexual” interpretation. In this paper,I suggest gendered readings of Dasein are potentially misleading. I argue Dasein is gendered only to the extent that “the Anyone” (das Man)—understood as relational background of social practices, institutions, and languages—constitutes the space or “clearing” (Lichtung) of intelligibility. However, this reading misrepresents the core motivation of Heidegger’s early project, namely to arrive at “temporality” (Zeitlichkeit) as the original source of any intelligibility whatsoever. For Heidegger, Dasein is to be understood in terms of the twofold movement of being “thrown” into the Past (Vergangenheit) and “projecting” into the Future (Zukunft). It is only the basis of the neutral temporal structures of “thrown projection” that beings can emerge-into-presence as such, enabling us to make sense of our Present (Gegenwart) gendered practices in the first place|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
François Jaran (2010). Toward a Metaphysical Freedom: Heidegger's Project of a Metaphysics of Dasein. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):205-227.
Piotr Hoffman (2000). Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism. Inquiry 43 (4):403 – 411.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1995). Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man. Inquiry 38 (4):423 – 430.
Irene McMullin (2009). Sharing the 'Now': Heidegger and the Temporal Co-Constitution of World. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):201-220.
Frederick A. Olafson (1994). Individualism, Subjectivity, and Presence: A Response to Taylor Carman. Inquiry 37 (3):331 – 337.
Frederick A. Olafson (1994). Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus. Inquiry 37 (1):45 – 64.
John Russon (2008). The Self as Resolution: Heidegger, Derrida and the Intimacy of the Question of the Meaning of Being. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1):90-110.
Andrea Kenkmann (2005). Circles of Solicitude and Concern. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):477 – 488.
Pierre Keller & David Weberman (1998). Heidegger and the Source(s) of Intelligibility. Continental Philosophy Review 31 (4):369-386.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,161 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?