Philosophy 80 (4):513-529 (2005)
|Abstract||If Wittgenstein's later account of language is applied to music, what seems to follow is a version of musical formalism. This is to say that the meaning of music is constituted by the rules of a given system of music, and the understanding of music is the ability to follow these rules. I argue that, while this view may seem unattractive at the outset, Wittgenstein actually held this view. Moreover, his later notion of a rule gives us resources to answer some of the traditional criticisms directed against formalism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nancy Sue Love (2002). "Singing for Our Lives": Women's Music and Democratic Politics. Hypatia 17 (4):71-94.
Leonard B. Meyer (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. [Chicago]University of Chicago Press.
Alessandro Arbo (2009). Some Remarks on “Hearing-as” and its Role in the Aesthetics of Music. Topoi 28 (2).
Robin Maconie (1997). The Science of Music. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan A. Neufeld (2009). Musical Formalism and Political Performances. Contemporary Aeshetics 7.
Hanne Appelqvist (2011). Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 40:75-88.
Roger Scruton (2004). Wittgenstein and the Understanding of Music. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):1-9.
Kathleen Marie Higgins (2012). The Music Between Us: Is Music a Universal Language? The University of Chicago Press.
Jenefer Robinson (ed.) (1997). Music & Meaning. Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #43,119 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?