A Consistency Challenge for Moral and Religious Beliefs

Teaching Philosophy 32 (2):127-151 (2009)
Abstract
What should individuals do when their firmly held moral beliefs are prima facie inconsistent with their religious beliefs? In this article weoutline several ways of posing such consistency challenges and offer a detailed taxonomy of the various responses available to someone facing a consistency challenge of this sort. Throughout the paper, our concerns are primarily pedagogical: how best to pose consistency challenges in the classroom, how to stimulate discussion of the various responses to them, and how to relate such consistency challenges to larger issues, such as whether scripture is, in general, a reliable guide to truth
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Scott Aikin, A Consistency Challenge for Moral and Religious Beliefs
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Patricia Trentacoste (2002). Why Aren't Moral People Always Moral? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):89-95.
Paolo Liberatore (2007). Consistency Defaults. Studia Logica 86 (1):89 - 110.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

59 ( #26,106 of 1,101,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #59,646 of 1,101,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.