Definitions, factual premises, and ethical conclusions

Philosophical Review 61 (3):331-348 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Multiple Conclusion Logic.D. J. Shoesmith & Timothy Smiley - 1978 - Cambridge, England / New York London Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Edited by T. J. Smiley.
The cognitive processes in informal reasoning.Victoria F. Shaw - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):51 – 80.
Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Intermediate conclusions.David H. Sanford - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):61 – 64.
Noncognitivism and wishfulness.James Lenman - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):265-274.
Hard cases: A procedural approach. [REVIEW]Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.
Who Needs Valid Moral Arguments?Mark T. Nelson - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):35-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#259,775)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references