Human Studies 29 (3):317 - 340 (2006)
|Abstract||Pragmatism’s naturalism is inconsistent with the phenomenological tradition’s anti-naturalism. This poses a problem for the methodological consistency of phenomenological work in the pragmatist tradition. Solutions such as phenomenologizing naturalism or naturalizing phenomenology have been proposed, but they fail. As a consequence, pragmatists and other naturalists must answer the phenomenological tradition’s criticisms of naturalism.|
|Keywords||naturalism phenomenology pragmatism science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Copp (2003). Why Naturalism? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Graham F. Macdonald (1992). The Nature of Naturalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66 (66):225-44.
Paul Kurtz (1990). Philosophical Essays in Pragmatic Naturalism. Prometheus Books.
Jerome Arthur Stone (2008). Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative. State University of New York Press.
Marvin Farber (1959). Naturalism and Subjectivism. Springfield, Ill.,C. C. Thomas.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Hugh P. McDonald (2002). Dewey's Naturalism. Environmental Ethics 24 (2):189-208.
Adam Konopka (2008). A Renewal of Husserl's Critique of Naturalism. Environmental Philosophy 5 (1):37-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads71 ( #14,674 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?