Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men

Argumentation 25 (1):87-105 (2011)
Abstract
Three forms of the straw man fallacy are posed: the straw, weak, and hollow man. Additionally, there can be non-fallacious cases of any of these species of straw man arguments
Keywords Straw man  Weak man  Fallacy theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,005
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Stan Baronett (2008). Logic. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Cass R. Sunstein (2002). The Law of Group Polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Louis P. Pojman (1998). Straw Man or Straw Theory? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):169-180.
Hugh LaFollette (1992). Real Men. In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman and Littlefield. 59--74.
Charles W. Harvey (2010). Making Hollow Men. Educational Theory 60 (2):189-201.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-17

Total downloads

21 ( #81,129 of 1,101,122 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #177,118 of 1,101,122 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.