Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 92 (1):39-67 (2010)
|Abstract||In the Treatise of Human Nature , Hume argues that, because we have adequate ideas of the smallest parts of space, we can infer that space itself must conform to our representations of it. The paper examines two challenges to this argument based on Descartes's and Locke's treatments of adequate ideas, ideas that fully capture the objects they represent. The first challenge, posed by Arnauld in his Objections to the Meditations , asks how we can know that an idea is adequate. The second challenge, implicit in Locke's Essay , asks how an empiricist can characterize an idea as inadequate, as both picking out an object and yet failing to capture it fully. In showing how Hume responds to these challenges, his theory of perceptual representation is explained and his treatment of space is related to his scepticism. His conclusion is shown not to be a characterization of space as it exists wholly apart from our powers of conception. Instead, in an adumbration of Kant, his claim is restricted to space as it appears to us.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rolf George (2006). James Jurin Awakens Hume From His Dogmatic Slumber. With a Short Tract on Visual Acuity. Hume Studies 32 (1):141-166.
Don Garrett (2006). Hume's Naturalistic Theory of Representation. Synthese 152 (3):301-319.
James Franklin (1994). Achievements and Fallacies in Hume's Account of Infinite Divisibility. Hume Studies 20 (1):85-101.
Max Jammer (1993). Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics. Dover Publications.
Max Jammer (1969). Concepts of Space. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
Marina Frasca-Spada (1998). Space and the Self in Hume's Treatise. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-03-11
Total downloads98 ( #8,151 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?