Bioethics and the problem of pluralism
Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):1-28 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMax Charlesworth (2005). Don't Blame the 'Bio' — Blame the 'Ethics': Varieties of (Bio) Ethics and the Challenge of Pluralism. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1).
Dermot Moran (1996). A Case for Philosophical Pluralism: The Problem of Intentionality. In Philosophy and Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
H. T. Engelhardt (2009). Moral Pluralism, the Crisis of Secular Bioethics, and the Divisive Character of Christian Bioethics: Taking the Culture Wars Seriously. Christian Bioethics 15 (3):234-253.
Chris Durante (2009). Agreeing to Disagree: Indigenous Pluralism From Human Rights to Bioethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):513-529.
Markus Neuvonen (2010). Sketching Further: A Comment on Tomasini's “What Is Bioethics: Notes Toward a New Approach?”. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (2).
Norman Lillegard (1993). Philosophers, Theologians, and the Pluralism Problem. Philosophy and Theology 7 (4):381-403.
George A. Reisch (1998). Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
Marc Ereshefsky (1998). Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism. Philosophy of Science 65 (1):103-120.
Douglas Edwards (2008). How to Solve the Problem of Mixed Conjunctions. Analysis 68 (298):143–149.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads37 ( #31,946 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
