Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):26--46 (2000)
|Abstract||The view that mathematical objects are indefinite in nature is presented and defended, hi the first section, Field's argument for fictionalism, given in response to Benacerraf's problem of identification, is closely examined, and it is contended that platonists can solve the problem equally well if they take the view that mathematical objects are indefinite. In the second section, two general arguments against the intelligibility of objectual indefiniteness are shown erroneous, hi the final section, the view is compared to mathematical structuralism, and it is shown that a version of structuralism should be understood as embracing the same view|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Balaguer, Fictionalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Andrej Krause (2008). Über Das Verhältnis Allgemeiner Und Individueller Materieller Und Mathematischer Gegenstände Nach Thomas Von Aquin. Vivarium 46 (2):155-174.
Øystein Linnebo (2009). Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mark Balaguer (1995). A Platonist Epistemology. Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.
Phil Corkum (2012). Aristotle on Mathematical Truth. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1057-1076.
Øystein Linnebo (2008). Structuralism and the Notion of Dependence. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):59-79.
Charles Parsons (2008). Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Parsons (2004). Structuralism and Metaphysics. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):56--77.
Audrey Yap (2009). Logical Structuralism and Benacerraf's Problem. Synthese 171 (1):157 - 173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,349 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?