|Abstract||This position paper argues that in addition to the familiar approach using formal contexts, there is now a need in AI to study contexts as social constructs. As a successful example of the latter approach, I draw attention to `interpretation' (in the sense of literary theory), viz. the reconstruction of intended meaning of a literary text that takes into account the context in which the author assumed the reader would place the text. An important contribution here comes from Harris (1988), enumerating the seven crucial dimensions of context: knowledge of reality, knowledge of language, and the authorial, generic, collective, specific, and textual dimensions. Finally, two thought-provoking papers in interpretation, (Barwise 1989) and (Hobbs 1990), are analyzed as useful attempts which also come to grips with the notion of context.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
William J. Rapaport (2003). What Is the “Context” for Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition? Proceedings of the 4th Joint International Conference on Cognitive Science/7th Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference 2:547-552.
Dov Gabbay, Rolf Nossum & John Woods (2006). Context-Dependent Abduction and Relevance. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1):65 - 81.
Sandra Jovchelovitch (2006). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community, and Culture. Routledge.
Kirsten Malmkjær & John Williams (eds.) (1998). Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph D. Lewandowski (2000). Thematizing Embeddedness: Reflexive Sociology as Interpretation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):49-66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?