Steps toward formalizing context
(1996)
| Abstract | The importance of contextual reasoning is emphasized by various researchers in AI. (A partial list includes John McCarthy and his group, R. V. Guha, Yoav Shoham, Giuseppe Attardi and Maria Simi, and Fausto Giunchiglia and his group.) Here, we survey the problem of formalizing context and explore what is needed for an acceptable account of this abstract notion. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCarlo Penco (2000). Three Alternatives on Context. In Diego Marconi (ed.), Knowledge and Meaning. Mercurio.
Bruce Edmonds & Varol Akman (2002). Editorial: Context in Context. Foundations of Science 7 (3):233-238.
Emar Maier (2006). Belief in Context: Towards a Unified Semantics of De Re and De Se Attitude Reports. Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,529 of 549,062 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,062 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
