Inquiry 12 (1-4):254-259 (1969)
|Abstract||In his Introduction to Logical Theory, Strawson argues that Aristotelian logic can be given a successful interpretation into ordinary English, but not into the symbolism of Principia Mathematica, on the grounds that Aristotelian logic and ordinary English share something absent in PM, namely, the doctrine of presupposition. It is argued that Strawson is mistaken. PM does justice to the logical rules of Aristotelian logic and also has a fully articulated doctrine of presupposition|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Justin Broackes (1993). Did Hume Hold a Regularity Theory of Causation? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (1):99 – 114.
William S. Cooper (1968). The Propositional Logic of Ordinary Discourse. Inquiry 11 (1-4):295 – 320.
P. T. Geach (1963). Mr. Strawson on Symbolic and Traditional Logic. Mind 72 (285):125-128.
T. J. Smiley (1967). Mr. Strawson on the Traditional Logic. Mind 76 (301):118-120.
P. F. Strawson, Pranab Kumar Sen & Roop Rekha Verma (eds.) (1995). The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Distributed by Allied Publishers.
P. F. Strawson (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. New York, Wiley.
Slavko Brkic (2004). Presuppositions, Logic, and Dynamics of Belief. Prolegomena 3 (2):151-177.
Herbert Hochberg (1970). Strawson, Russell, and the King of France. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):363-384.
Jacek Malinowski (2006). On the Formalization of Strawson's Presupposition. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #154,724 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?