Attachment styles and ethical behavior: Their relationship and significance in the marketplace [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):299 - 316 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper compares the ethical standards reported by consumers and managers with different attachment styles (secure, preoccupied, fearful, or dismissing). We conducted two studies of consumer ethical beliefs and a third managerial survey. In Study 1, we used a questionnaire that we constructed, and in Study 2, we used the Muncy–Vitell Consumer Ethics Scale. The results in both the studies were consistent and showed that men reported a greater indifference to ethical transgressions than women. Based on the two studies, the results indicate that␣among male consumers, the dismissing participants reported the greatest overall indifference to ethical transgressions and the secure participants expressed the most ethical beliefs. The two intermediate groups did not differ significantly from each other. In Study 1, none of the women consumers reported a dismissing attachment style. Women with a secure style reported more ethical beliefs than those in the other two groups. However, the sample in Study 2 included dismissing women. The dismissing women reported the greatest overall indifference to ethical transgressions and the secure women expressed the most ethical beliefs. The illegal profit subscale described the most severe ethical transgressions, and for both men and women, the secure participants were less apt than the other participants to report a willingness to transgress. In Study 3, the Newstrom and Ruch (1975, MSU Business Topics, Winter, 31) Questionnaire was administered to 227 managers. All four attachment patterns were represented among the participants of both genders. In all cases, the participants with a dismissing attachment style showed the greatest readiness to transgress.|
|Keywords||attachment styles consumer ethics managerial ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kumar C. Rallapalli, Scott J. Vitell, Frank A. Wiebe & James H. Barnes (1994). Consumer Ethical Beliefs and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):487 - 495.
Satish P. Deshpande, Elizabeth George & Jacob Joseph (2000). Ethical Climates and Managerial Success in Russian Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):211 - 217.
Randi L. Sims (2002). Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 40 (2):101 - 109.
Abhijit M. Patwardhan, Megan E. Keith & Scott J. Vitell (2012). Religiosity, Attitude Toward Business, and Ethical Beliefs: Hispanic Consumers in the United States. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):61-70.
Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (1996). Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Austrian Consumers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (9):1009 - 1019.
Marshall Schminke (1997). Gender Differences in Ethical Frameworks and Evaluation of Others' Choices in Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (1):55-65.
Marshall Schminke & Maureen L. Ambrose (1997). Asymmetric Perceptions of Ethical Frameworks of Men and Women in Business and Nonbusiness Settings. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):719-729.
Scott J. Vitell, James R. Lumpkin & Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (1991). Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):365 - 375.
Ziad Swaidan, Scott J. Vitell & Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (2003). Consumer Ethics: Determinants of Ethical Beliefs of African Americans. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):175 - 186.
Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas, Ziad Swaidan & Mine Oyman (2005). Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Turkish and American Consumers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):183 - 195.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,873 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?