On Judging Epistemic Credibility: Is Social Identity Relevant?
In Naomi Zack (ed.), On Judging Epistemic Credibility: Is Social Identity Relevant? Wiley-Blackwell (2000)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||feminism politics epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Allison Weir (2008). Global Feminism and Transformative Identity Politics. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 110-133.
Karen Jones (2002). The Politics of Credibility. In Louise Antony & Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Westview Press.
Sonia Kruks (1995). Identity Politics and Dialectical Reason: Beyond an Epistemology of Provenance. Hypatia 10 (2):1 - 22.
Linda Alcoff (ed.) (2006). Identity Politics Reconsidered. Palgrave Macmillan.
Linda Martín Alcoff (2010). Epistemic Identities. Episteme 7 (2):128-137.
José Medina (2011). The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary. Social Epistemology 25 (1):15-35.
Miranda Fricker (2003). Epistemic Injustice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing. Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):154-173.
Linda Martín Alcoff (2010). Sotomayor's Reasoning. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):122-138.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-07-07
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?