|Abstract||In this article, I use the 5Ps Framework for Ethical Problem Solving to begin meaningful discourse on the ethical problems in cultural property law pertaining to indigenous descendants of creator cultures. I use the divisiveness in the cultural property debates and the recent passage of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as a backdrop, highlighting points of tension between indigenous interests and those of other cultural property stakeholders. I identify three ongoing ethical problems in international cultural property law: (1) that indigenous peoples are persistently underrepresented; (2) that the current cultural property model inappropriately ties possession/control to beneficial interest, such that arguments against indigenous peoples getting control of artifacts prevent them from receiving a beneficial interest; and (3) that unsolicited representation of indigenous interests reinforces the damaging idea that they are in need of custodial care, undermining the argument that they are competent to control cultural property. I conclude with a recommendation that stakeholders proceed to the second level of ethical decision making, exploring what options will address these ethical concerns. Indigenous involvement in this process in crucial. I suggest that better recognition is given to indigenous interests as distinct from those of other stakeholders, especially source nations. I further propose that indigenous peoples are more effectively involved in resolving international cultural property disputes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Indigenous Rights and Environmental Justice. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-91.
Susan Dodds (1998). Justice and Indigenous Land Rights. Inquiry 41 (2):187 – 205.
Helena Kajlich (2008). Indigenous Peoples and Genetic Population Research : Reflections on a Culturally Appropriate Model of Indigenous Participant Consent. In Barbara Ann Hocking (ed.), The Nexus of Law and Biology: New Ethical Challenges. Ashgate Pub. Company.
Andrew Hunter (2007). Indigenous Peoples' Intellectual Property. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:97-103.
Claire Smith & Hans Martin Wobst (eds.) (2005). Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice. Routledge.
Megan Jane Davis, Indigenous Rights and the Constitution: Making the Case for Constitutional Reform.
Terry Dunbar & Margaret Scrimgeour (2006). Ethics in Indigenous Research – Connecting with Community. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3).
Mark F. N. Franke (2007). Self-Determination Versus the Determination of Self: A Critical Reading of the Colonial Ethics Inherent to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):359 – 379.
Added to index2009-02-27
Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,197 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,197 )
How can I increase my downloads?