Concerning a postulate of fitness
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (3):309-318 (1954)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHenry C. Byerly & Richard E. Michod (1991). Fitness and Evolutionary Explanation. Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):45-53.
Marshall Abrams (2009). The Unity of Fitness. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Klaus Henle (1991). Some Reflections on Evolutionary Theories, with a Classification of Fitness. Acta Biotheoretica 39 (2).
Marshall Abrams (2007). Fitness and Propensity's Annulment? Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):115-130.
Henry Byerly (1986). Fitness as a Function. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:494 - 501.
Robert C. Richardson & Richard M. Burian (1992). A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:349 - 362.
Andre Ariew (2009). What Fitness Can't Be. Erkenntnis 71 (3):289 - 301.
André Ariew & R. C. Lewontin (2004). The Confusions of Fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):347-363.
James Maclaurin, Fitness: Philosophical Problems. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
