Economics is Too Important to Be Left to the Rhetoricians
Economics and Philosophy 4 (01):129- (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeremy R. Bell (2010). Empeiria Kai Tribē. Epoché 15 (2):379-394.
Hans Lind (1993). A Note on Fundamental Theory and Idealizations in Economics and Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):493-503.
Alexander Rosenberg (1986). Lakatosian Consolations for Economics. Economics and Philosophy 2 (01):127-.
Uskali Mäki (1996). Two Portraits of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (1):1-38.
Alexander Rosenberg (1988). Rhetoric is Not Important Enough for Economists to Bother About. Economics and Philosophy 4 (01):173-.
Douglas W. Hands (1984). What Economics is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
Alexander Rosenberg (1992). Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? University of Chicago Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads15 ( #78,782 of 551,625 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,625 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
