Graduate studies at Western
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):69-80 (2009)
|Abstract||We have two aims in this paper. The first is negative: to demonstrate the problems in Bernard Gert’s account of common morality, in particular as it applies to professional morality. The second is positive: to suggest a more satisfactory explanation of the moral basis of professional role morality, albeit one that is broadly consistent with Gert’s notion of common morality, but corrects and supplements Gert’s theory. The paper is in three sections. In the first, we sketch the main features of Gert’s account of common morality in general. In the second, we outline Gert’s explanation of the source of professional moral rules and demonstrate its inadequacy. In the third section, we provide an account of our own collectivist needs-based view of the source of the role-moral obligations of many professional roles, including those of health care professionals.|
|Keywords||Bernard Gert Professions Role morality Common morality Ethical theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bernard Gert (1988). Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. Oxford University Press.
Oliver Rauprich (2008). Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):43-71.
Bernard Gert (1998). Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press.
Robin R. Radtke (2008). Role Morality in the Accounting Profession – How Do We Compare to Physicians and Attorneys? Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):279 - 297.
R. M. Hare (1992). Morality, Moral Theory, and Applied and Professional Ethics Reply to Bernard Gert. Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 1 (1-2):25-30.
Bernard Gert (1992). Morality, Moral Theory, and Applied and Professional Ethics. Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 1 (1-2):5-24.
K. A. Wallace (2009). Common Morality and Moral Reform. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):55-68.
Bernard Gert (2004). Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press.
John D. Arras (2009). The Hedgehog and the Borg: Common Morality in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):11-30.
Bernard Gert (1999). Common Morality and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.
Added to index2009-02-11
Total downloads49 ( #25,823 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?