Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko

Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287 (2012)
Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko Content Type Journal Article Category Original Paper Pages 1-7 DOI 10.1007/s11572-012-9143-3 Authors Larry Alexander, San Diego, CA, USA Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Camden, NJ, USA Journal Criminal Law and Philosophy Online ISSN 1871-9805 Print ISSN 1871-9791
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-012-9143-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Dan Robins (2012). Reply to Ian Johnston. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):271-272.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1998). Reply to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):753-764.
Stephen C. Angle (2010). A Reply to Fan Ruiping. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):463-464.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #200,376 of 1,724,902 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #268,623 of 1,724,902 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.