Graduate studies at Western
Ratio Juris 25 (1):2-14 (2012)
|Abstract||In the debate between positivism and non-positivism the argument from relativism plays a pivotal role. The argument from relativism, as put forward, for instance, by Hans Kelsen, says, first, that a necessary connection between law and morality presupposes the existence of absolute, objective, or necessary moral elements, and, second, that no such absolute, objective, or necessary moral elements exist. My reply to this is that absolute, objective, or necessary moral elements do exist, for human rights exist, and human rights exist because they are justifiable|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jacqueline A. Laing (2006). A Certain Kind of Moral Scepticism and the Foundations of Human Rights. Law and Justice 157:39-53.
Robert Alexy (2002). The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (2004). Incorporation by Law. Legal Theory 10 (1):1-17.
Clark Butler (2002). Human Rights. Philo 5 (1):5-22.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
John Mahoney (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance. Blackwell Pub..
Roger Trigg (2005). Morality Matters. Blackwell Pub..
Gary B. Herbert (2005). On the Misconceived Genealogy of Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:17-32.
José Antonio Marina (2000). Genealogy of Morality and Law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):303-325.
Ch Perelman (1982). The Safeguarding and Foundation of Human Rights. Law and Philosophy 1 (1):119 - 129.
Added to index2012-02-23
Total downloads35 ( #39,256 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?