Epoché 9 (1):79-99 (2004)
|Abstract||This paper intends to explain key differences between Aristotle’s understanding of the relationships between nous, epistêmê, and the art of syllogistic reasoning(both analytic and dialectical) and the corresponding modern conceptions of intuition, knowledge, and reason. By uncovering paradoxa that Aristotle’s understanding of syllogistic reasoning presents in relation to modern philosophical conceptions of logic and science, I highlight problems of a shift in modern philosophy—a shift that occurs most dramatically in the seventeenth century—toward a project of construction, a pervasive desire for rational certainty, and a general insistence on the reducibility of the sciences. The major motivation of this analysis is my intention to show that modern attempts to reduce science/epistêmê to a single science/method of inquiry occlude dialectical and ethico-political dimensions of “reason” and, hence, also impoverish philosophy’s critical capacities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Is Aristotle's Syllogistic a Logic? History and Philosophy of Logic.
Marko Malink (2006). A Reconstruction of Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):95-141.
Anne Newstead (2001). Aristotle and Modern Mathematical Theories of the Continuum. In Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou & James Brown (eds.), Aristotle and Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Peter Lang.
Dwayne Raymond (2011). Polarity and Inseparability: The Foundation of the Apodictic Portion of Aristotle's Modal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3):193-218.
Jan Łukasiewicz (1957/1987). Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Garland Pub..
J. J. C. (1957). Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. The Review of Metaphysics 11 (2):349-349.
Andrew Romiti (2011). Jacob Klein on the Dispute Between Plato and Aristotle Regarding Number. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:249-270.
Edward M. Engelmann (2007). Aristotle's Syllogystic, Modern Deductive Logic, and Scientific Demonstration. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):535-552.
George Boger (1998). Completion, Reduction and Analysis: Three Proof-Theoretic Processes in Aristotle'sprior Analytics. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):187-226.
Kurt Mosser (2008). Kant's General Logic and Aristotle. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:181-189.
Paolo Crivelli (2004). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Klaus J. Schmidt (2011). On the Unity of Modal Syllogistics in Aristotle. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 13 (1):54-86.
William Kneale (1952). Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. By Jan Lukasiewicz. (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1951. Pp. Xi + 141. 15s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 27 (102):279-.
Todd S. Mei (2009). The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads61 ( #15,525 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,757 of 549,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?