Aldine de Gruyter (1987)
|Abstract||Despite wide acceptance that the attributes of living creatures have appeared through a cumulative evolutionary process guided chiefly by natural selection, many human activities have seemed analytically inaccessible through such an approach. Prominent evolutionary biologists, for example, have described morality as contrary to the direction of biological evolution, and moral philosophers rarely regard evolution as relevant to their discussions. The Biology of Moral Systems adopts the position that moral questions arise out of conflicts of interest, and that moral systems are ways of using confluences of interest at lower levels of social organiation to deal with conflicts of interest at higher levels. Moral systems are described as systems of indirect reciprocity: humans gain and lose socially and reproductively not only by direct transactions, but also by the reputations they gain from the everyday flow of social interactions. The author develops a general theory of human interests, using senescence and effort theory from biology, to help analye the patterning of human lifetimes. He argues that the ultimate interests of humans are reproductive, and that the concept of morality has arisen within groups because of its contribution to unity in the context, ultimately, of success in intergroup competition. He contends that morality is not easily relatable to universals, and he carries this argument into a discussion of what he calls the greatest of all moral problems, the nuclear arms race.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.85 used (77% off) $24.58 new (26% off) $31.30 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Collier, Critical Notice of Richard D. Alexander, The Biology of Moral Systems, New York: Aldine de Gruyter 1987. Pp. Xxi+301.
Frans B. M. de Waal (2004). Monkey Business and Business Ethics. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:7-41.
Rory Smead (2010). Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of “Moral Signals”. Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):33-51.
Giovanni Boniolo & Gabriele De Anna (eds.) (2006). Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Dennis Krebs (2008). Morality: An Evolutionary Account. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (3):149-172.
Lee Cronk (1994). Evolutionary Theories of Morality and the Manipulative Use of Signals. Zygon 29 (1):81-101.
Samuel Scheffler (1992). Human Morality. Oxford University Press.
Douglas Allchin (2009). The Evolution of Morality. Evolution 2 (4):590-601.
Karl E. Peters (2003). Pluralism and Ambivalence in the Evolution of Morality. Zygon 38 (2):333-354.
Deborah G. Johnson & Keith W. Miller (2008). Un-Making Artificial Moral Agents. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):123-133.
Chandra Sekhar Sripada (2005). Punishment and the Strategic Structure of Moral Systems. Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):767–789.
Tim Dean (2012). Evolution and Moral Diversity. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 7:1-16.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-04-03
Total downloads1 ( #291,771 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?