When Analytic Narratives Explain

Abstract
Rational choice modeling originating in economics is sweeping across many areas of social science. This paper examines a popular methodological proposal for integrating formal models from game theory with more traditional narrative explanations of historical phenomena, known as “analytic narratives”. Under what conditions are we justified in thinking that an analytic narrative provides a good explanation? In this paper I criticize the existing criteria and provide a set of my own. Along the way, I address the critique of analytic narratives by Jon Elster.
Keywords ANALYTIC NARRATIVES   RATIONAL CHOICE MODELS   CAUSAL EXPLANATION   DE-IDEALIZATION
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
C. Behan McCullagh (2000). The Structure and Objectivity of Historical Narratives. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:145-158.
Richard Swinburne (1984). Analytic/Synthetic. American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):31 - 42.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

22 ( #79,412 of 1,102,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,871 of 1,102,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.