David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Political Theory 32 (2):146-171 (2004)
How best to avoid the Levinas Effect, as it has been called, the tendency to make Emmanuel Levinas everything to everyone? One way is to demonstrate that Levinas's thinking does not fit into any of the categories by which we ordinarily approach political theory. If one were forced to categorize Levinas's political theory, the term "inverted liberalism " would come closest to the mark. As long, that is, as one emphasizes the term "inverted" over "liberalism." Levinas's defense of liberalism is likely the strangest defense the reader has encountered. We should, argues Levinas, foster and protect the individual because only the individual can see the tears of the other, the tears that even the just regime cannot see. The individual is to be fostered and protected for the sake of the other individual. Whether this has anything to do with "real" liberalism, and whether it should, is the topic of this essay
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
J. Aaron Simmons & Scott F. Aikin (2012). Prospects for A Levinasian Epistemic Infinitism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (3):437-460.
Similar books and articles
Simon Critchley (2004). Five Problems in Levinas's View of Politics and the Sketch of a Solution to Them. Political Theory 32 (2):172-185.
V. Tahmasebi (2010). Does Levinas Justify or Transcend Liberalism? Levinas on Human Liberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):523-544.
Georg W. Bertram (2006). Die Idee der Philosophie von Emmanuel Lévinas. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:241-260.
Emmanuel Lévinas (1989). The Levinas Reader. B. Blackwell.
Sara E. Roberts (2000). Rethinking Justice. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):5-12.
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael L. Morgan (2005). Levinas and Judaism. Levinas Studies 1:1-17.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #30,579 of 1,413,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #41,994 of 1,413,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?