Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358 (2010)
|Abstract||There is a divide within political and legal theory concerning the justification of hate-crime legislation in liberal states. Opponents of Hate-Crime Legislation have recently argued that enhanced punishment for hate-motivated crimes cannot be justified within political liberal states. More specifically, Heidi Hurd argues that criminal sanction which target character dispositions unfairly target individuals for characteristics not readily under their control. She further argues that a âcharacterâ based approach in criminal law is necessarily illiberal and violates the stateâs commitment to political neutrality. In the current paper, I attempt to show the difficulties and absurdity that follows from Hurdâs characterization of hate- rimes. I aim to show that punishment for undesirable character traits is consistent with western conceptions of criminal law. Upon doing so, I then go on to construct a positive argument for the justifiability of punishing for character traits as well as for the enhanced punishment associated with hate-motivated crimes.|
|Keywords||Heidi Hurd Criminal responsibility Hate crimes Enhanced punishment Character theory Liberalism Conception of the good Character traits|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Heidi M. Hurd (2001). Why Liberals Should Hate ``Hate Crime Legislation''. Law and Philosophy 20 (2):215 - 232.
Christopher Heath Wellman (2006). A Defense of Stiffer Penalties for Hate Crimes. Hypatia 21 (2):62-80.
M. H. (2001). Why Liberals Should Hate ``Hate Crime Legislation''. Law and Philosophy 20 (2):215-232.
Sonu Bedi (2011). Why a Criminal Prohibition on Sex Selective Abortions Amounts to a Thought Crime. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):349-360.
Amy R. Baehr (2003). A Feminist Liberal Approach to Hate Crime Legislation. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):134–152.
Kory Schaff (2000). Hate Speech and the Problems of Agency. Social Philosophy Today 16:185-201.
David Boonin (2011). Should Race Matter?: Unusual Answers to the Usual Questions. Cambridge University Press.
David Brax & Christian Munthe (2013). The Philosophy of Hate Crime Anthology. University of Gothenburg.
James Weinstein (1992). First Amendment Challenges to Hate Crime Legislation: Where's the Speech? Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):6-20.
David Brax & Christian Munthe (2013). Part I: Introduction to the Philosophy of Hate Crime. In The Philosophy of Hate Crime Anthology. University of Gothenburg.
Donald A. Dripps (2009). The Priority of Politics and Procedure Over Perfectionism in Penal Law, or, Blackmail in Perspective. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):247-260.
Ralph Wedgwood (2003). Review of Jacobs and Potter, Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics. [REVIEW] Journal of Homosexuality 45 (1):152-159.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads38 ( #35,926 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,287 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?