Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 10 (2) (2009)
|Abstract||In this paper the author reviews the most debated theories of art in contemporary aesthetics and offers a new, intentional-attributive definition of art. He begins by expanding on Weitz’s theory, after which he presents arguments that refute Weitz's claim that it is logically impossible to define art. The author then examines the institutional, the historical, and the aesthetic definitions of art and shows that all of these have weaknesses and none stands up completely to criticism. Taking into consideration the shortcomings of the examined definitions, he suggests his own definition of art: for all x, x is an artwork if the author of x mainly intended to reveal such properties of x, the perception of which would evoke experiences, containing ends in themselves.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Crowther (2007). Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Davies (2007/2010). Philosophical Perspectives on Art. New York;Oxford University Press.
K. Stock (2000). Some Objections to Stecker's Historical Functionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):479-491.
Gregory Currie (2010). Actual Art, Possible Art, and Art's Definition. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3):235-241.
Paul Crowther (2004). Defining Art, Defending the Canon, Contesting Culture. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):361-377.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Are Video Games Art? Contemporary Aesthetics 2.
Added to index2009-11-29
Total downloads46 ( #28,087 of 722,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,358 of 722,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?