Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (2):151-160 (2010)
|Abstract||Scholars have detected hostility to technology in Daoist thought. But is this a problem with any machine or only some applications of some machines by some people? I show that the problem is not with machines per se but with the people who introduce them, or more exactly with their knowledge. It is not knowledge as such that causes the disorder Laozi and Zhuangzi associate with machines; it is confused, disordered knowledge—superficial, inadequate, unsubtle, and artless. In other words the problem is not with machines but with the ethics of engineering and the government of technology. The Daoist argument does not devalue machines or knowledge of them; instead, it sets a new goal, defining an alternative ideal—alternative to techniques held hostage to despotic ideas about efficiency and profit.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fumikazu Shibasaki (2005). Technology and Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (4):487-498.
Barry Allen (2003). Knowledge and Civilization. Westview Press.
B. Jack Copeland (2002). Accelerating Turing Machines. Minds and Machines 12 (2):281-300.
Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) (2000). Technology and the Good Life? University of Chicago Press.
Pentti O. A. Haikonen (2003). The Cognitive Approach to Conscious Machines. Thorverton UK: Imprint Academic.
Pak-Hang Wong (2012). Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):67-86.
Amy E. Wendling (2009). Karl Marx on Technology and Alienation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Carl Mitcham (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-04-17
Total downloads51 ( #20,487 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?