David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 44 (1):85 (1994)
Developments in the Academy from the time of Arcesilaus to that of Carneades and his successors tend to be classified under two heads: scepticism and probabilism. Carneades was principally responsible for the Academy's view of the latter subject, and our sources credit him with an elaborate discussion of it. The evidence furnished by those sources is, however, frequently confusing and sometimes self-contradictory. My aim in this paper is to extract a coherent account of Carneades' theory of probability from the testimony with a further end in view, namely to understand better the uses to which that theory was put by the Academy in its debate with the Stoa. Though it is not its principal object, the investigation should also help make clear how the Academy's scepticism and its probabilism were related to each other as parts of a single consistent practice of philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Diego E. Machuca (2011). Ancient Skepticism: The Skeptical Academy. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):259-266.
Douglas Walton, Christopher W. Tindale & Thomas F. Gordon (2014). Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning. Argumentation 28 (1):85-119.
Similar books and articles
Eric Thomas Weber (2009). The Responsibilities and Dangers of Pragmatism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):123-129.
Mark Kaplan (2010). In Defense of Modest Probabilism. Synthese 176 (1):41 - 55.
Lloyd P. Gerson (2009). Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Maria Carla Galavotti (1996). Probabilism and Beyond. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):253 - 265.
Brian Skyrms (1996). The Structure of Radical Probabilism. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):285 - 297.
Brad Inwood & Lloyd P. Gerson (eds.) (2008). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett Pub. Co., Inc..
John Hosack (1991). On Probabilism and Induction. Topoi 10 (2):227-229.
Nicholas Maxwell (1988). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible? Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part Two). In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. CUP
Patrick Maher (2002). Joyce's Argument for Probabilism. Philosophy of Science 69 (1):73-81.
Nicholas Maxwell (1985). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 52 (1):23-43.
William Stephens (2012). The Ideal of the Stoic Sportsman. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (2):196-211.
Lina Eriksson & Alan Hájek (2007). What Are Degrees of Belief? Studia Logica 86 (2):185-215.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads31 ( #128,641 of 1,907,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #276,350 of 1,907,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?