Bradley's Argument Against Correspondence
Idealistic Studies 10 (3):232-244 (1980)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
David Holdcroft (1981). Bradley and the Impossibility of Absolute Truth. History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):25-39.
James Thomas (2001). Selected Correspondence (1905–1924). Bradley Studies 7 (1):101-124.
James W. Allard (2005). The Logical Foundations of Bradley's Metaphysics: Judgment, Inference, and Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Mikel Burley (2004). Bradley and Schopenhauer, and the Epicurean Argument Concerning Death. Bradley Studies 10 (1/2):42-54.
F. H. Bradley (1999). Collected Works of F.H. Bradley. Thoemmes Press.
F. H. Bradley (1905). Notes and Correspondence. Mind 14 (3):436-439.
Holger Leerhoff (2008). Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1:249-264.
Bradley Armour-Garb & JC Beall (2002). Further Remarks on Truth and Contradiction. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):217-225.
B. Hill (2012). Defending the Ramsey Test: What is Wrong with Preservation? Mind 121 (481):131-146.
T. L. S. Sprigge (2001). Selected Correspondence (1872–1904). Bradley Studies 7 (1):78-100.
A. C. Genova (2001). How Wittgenstein Escapes the Slingshot. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:1-22.
Peter Carruthers (1981-1982). Frege's Regress. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 82:17 - 32.
Paul Rabin (1996). The Correspondence Between Bertrand Russell and Harold Joachim. Bradley Studies 2 (2):131-160.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

