Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics
Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2) (2008)
| Abstract | It has become almost a truism to describe the interaction between research ethics committees and researchers as being marred by distrust and conflict. The ethical conduct of researchers is increasingly a matter of institutional concern because of the degree to which non-compliance with national standards can expose the entire institution to risk. This has transformed research ethics into what some have described as a research ethics industry. In an operational sense, there is considerable focus on modifying research behaviour through a combination of education and sanctions. The assessment of whether a researcher is ethical is too often based on whether they submit their work for review by an ethics committee. However, is such an approach making a useful contribution to the actual ethical conduct of research and the protection of the interests of participants? Does a focus on ethical review minimise institutional risk? Instead it has been suggested that ethics committees may be distorting or frustrating useful research and are promoting a culture of either mindless rule following or frustrated resistance. An alternative governance approach is required. There is a need for a strong institutional focus on promoting and supporting the reflective practice of researchers through every stage of their work. By situating research ethics within the broader framework of institutional governance, this paper suggests it is possible to establish arrangements that actually facilitate excellent and ethical research | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDennis John Mazur (2007). Evaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on Humans: A Guide for Irb Members. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Michael Owen (2006). Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research. Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4).
Sheila Slaughter (2002). Commentary on “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2).
Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame (2004). Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here'. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
Daniel A. Griffith (2008). Ethical Considerations in Geographic Research: What Especially Graduate Students Need to Know. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Katinka de Wet (2010). The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):301-314.
Mark Rice (2011). The Institutional Review Board is an Impediment to Human Research: The Result is More Animal-Based Research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):12-.
Dominique Rivière (2011). Looking From the Outside/In: Re-Thinking Research Ethics Review. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):193-204.
Joan E. Sieber (2004). Empirical Research on Research Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,551 of 548,979 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
