|Abstract||This first chapter locates crucial elements of James's notion of truth within James's 'The Will to Believe." James recognizes evidential criteria in the formation of belief, in contrast to a common claim that for him beliefs are generated in an evidential vacuum. Jamess view of evidence in "The Will to Believe" also stands as a pragmatic reappraisal of traditional epistemology, and such criteria are individualistic. But his treatment should not be taken as subjectivist, in the sense that personal whim or desire always override evidential criteria in the formation of belief. Rather, James's view allows him to avoid both subjectivism and traditional evidentialism. The second chapter suggests that "The Will to Believe" also contains a notion of pluralism, which is intimately related to radical empiricism. James develops two levels of pluralism, individualistic and social. Whereas the first chapter concerns inquiry on an individual level, the second locates the individual within society. James's position on pluralism is also discussed briefly in relation to contemporary ethical theory. Perhaps James's most important notion is that of an "intellectual republic." Such a republic would emerge from a productive mediation between the two levels of pluralism outlined in the essay. In closing, it is suggested that the relationship between James and Josiah Royce illustrates James's ideal of such mediation. The third chapter develops notions of social inquiry hinted at by James within the more radically social philosophy of John Dewey. Following a brief discussion of Platonic assumptions regnant in contemporary discussions, Dewey's views are offered as an alternative to some unpalatable consequences of Platonism. A brief discussion of Dewey's metaphysics and epistemology follows; Dewey manages to avoid both Platonism and relativism, while maintaining the stable and precarious elements traditionally associated with either approach. In conclusion, it is suggested that Dewey's use of the stable and precarious constitute a basis for his notion of criticism, where inquiry is viewed not as a bid for ultimate clarity, but rather as a pattern of interrelationships between elements imbedded within context. Since escape from context is impossible, clarity is also contextual|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Randy L. Friedman (2006). Deweyan Pragmatism. William James Studies 1 (1).
Mark Uffelman (2011). Forging the Self in the Stream of Experience: Classical Currents of Self-Cultivation in James and Dewey. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (3):319-339.
John Dewey (1910). William James. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (19):505-508.
H. G. Callaway (1997). Review of James Campbell, Understanding John Dewey. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):272-275.
Guy Axtell (forthcoming). Possibility and Permission? Intellectual Character, Inquiry, and the Ethics of Belief. In Pihlstrom S. & Rydenfelt H. (eds.), William James on Religion. (Palgrave McMillan “Philosophers in Depth” Series.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Experience, Experimentalism, and Religious Overbelief. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:129-134.
John Dewey (1922). Realism Without Monism or Dualism--I.: Knowledge Involving the Past. Journal of Philosophy 19 (12):309-317.
Kristy Nicole Kyle, Eidos in Process: Darwin, Classical American Philosophy and the Possibility of Belief.
James Good (2008). Dewey's “Permanent Hegelian Deposit”: A Reply to Hickman and Alexander. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 577-602.
Larry A. Hickman (2008). Dewey's Hegel: A Search for Unity in Diversity, or Diversity as the Growth of Unity? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 569-576.
Maurice Baum (1928). A Comparative Study of the Philosophies of William James and John Dewey. Thesis: University of Chicago.
James Flaherty (2005). Rorty, Religious Beliefs, and Pragmatism. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):175-185.
R. Shusterman (2011). The Pragmatist Aesthetics of William James. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):347-361.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-08
Total downloads4 ( #188,845 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?