Asian Philosophy 4 (2):127 – 136 (1994)
|Abstract||Abstract The theme of this paper is that while there are four seemingly contradictory classes of statements in the Tao de Ching regarding moral values and the Taoist sage, these statements can be interpreted to be consistent with each other. There are statements which seemingly state or imply that nothing at all can be said about the Tao; there are statements which seemingly state or imply that all value judgements are relative; there are statements which appear to attribute moral behaviour to the Taoist sage and there are statements which appear to attribute amoral or immoral behaviour to the Taoist sage. A consistent interpretation of these different statements can be found first by qualifying the assertion that the Tao is not capable of description to the less absolute assertion that nothing absolutely true can be said about the Tao; second, by arguing that the statements that appear to make all values relative refer to the correlativity of concepts, not the equality of values. Moreover, since the statements that appear to attribute moral behaviour to the sage are, by virtue of their predominance in the text, well justified and that by virtue of their paucity in the text, it is plausible to seek an alternate interpretation for the statements that seem to attribute amoral or immoral behaviour to the sage. Finally, the way in which the sage can be seen as good without attributing goodness to the Tao is by distinguishing between the way the sage appears to the observer who is outside of the Tao and the way in which the sage appears to himself. This latter distinction takes the form of the sage as appearing to display the quality of goodness in itself but not goodness for itself|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Subash Durlabhji (2004). The Tao of Organization Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 52 (4):401 - 409.
Friederike Assandri (2009). Beyond the Daode Jing: Twofold Mystery in Tang Daoism. Three Pines Press.
Hwang Yi (1988). To Become a Sage: The Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning. Columbia University Press.
Rupert C. Allen (1996). The Yin-Yang Journal: An Alternative Reading of the Tao Te Ching. Inner Eye Press.
Lao Tzu & Laozi (2012). Tao Te Ching: An All-New Translation. Shambhala Publications.
Jenny Liu (ed.) (1999). The Profound Truth of Tao =. Tien Tao Association ;.
Damian J. Bebell & Shannon M. Fera (2000). Comparison and Analysis of Selected English Interpretations of the Tao Te Ching. Asian Philosophy 10 (2):133 – 147.
Eva Wong (ed.) (1997). Teachings of the Tao: Readings From the Taoist Spiritual Tradition. Distributed in the U.S. By Random House.
Ellen M. Chen (2005). How Taoist Is Heidegger? International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):5-19.
Eva Wong (ed.) (1999). The Pocket Tao Reader. Distributed in the U.S. By Random House.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #51,617 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?