Predictions and Primitive Ontology in Quantum Foundations: A Study of Examples

A major disagreement between different views about the foundations of quantum mechanics concerns whether for a theory to be intelligible as a fundamental physical theory it must involve a ‘primitive ontology’ (PO), i.e. variables describing the distribution of matter in four-dimensional space–time. In this article, we illustrate the value of having a PO. We do so by focussing on the role that the PO plays for extracting predictions from a given theory and discuss valid and invalid derivations of predictions. To this end, we investigate a number of examples based on toy models built from the elements of familiar interpretations of quantum theory.11 Introduction2 The GRWm and GRWf Theories2.1 The GRW process2.2 GRWm2.3 GRWf3 Predictions and Primitive Ontology3.1 Calibration functions3.2 Taking the PO seriously3.3 Examples from the literature3.4 The main theorem about operators in the GRW formalism3.5 The GRW formalism4 A Set of Examples4.1 Bohmian mechanics4.2 Bohmian trajectories and GRW collapses4.2.1 Bohm’s law and GRW’s law4.2.2 Bohm’s law and a modified GRW law4.2.3 Trajectories from the GRW wave function4.2.4 Configuration jumps and GRW law4.2.5 Another way of configuration jumps and GRW law4.3 MBM: Bohm-like trajectories from the master equation4.3.1 Empirical equivalence of MBM with GRWm and GRWf4.4 Master equation and matter density4.5 Master equation and flashes5 Conclusions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axs048
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Hilary Putnam (2005). A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics (Again). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):615-634.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kelvin J. McQueen (2015). Four Tails Problems for Dynamical Collapse Theories. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49:10-18.
Michael Esfeld (2014). The Primitive Ontology of Quantum Physics: Guidelines for an Assessment of the Proposals. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:99-106.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gordon Belot (2012). Quantum States for Primitive Ontologists: A Case Study. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):67-83.
Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi (2004). What is Bohmian Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43:1743-1755.
Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi (2008). On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.
Peter Mittelstaedt (2012). Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):215-222.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

131 ( #32,789 of 1,902,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #90,948 of 1,902,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.