Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):53-60 (2000)
|Abstract||I argue that Johanna Meehan's call to examine the extra-linguistic psychic, affective and biological dimensions of gender identity is extremely important both for feminist theory in particular and for contemporary Continental philosophy in general. However, I suspect that such an examination might necessitate more than a mere expansion or reconstruction of Habermas' views; on the contrary, I suggest that Meehan's line of argument might lead instead toward a radical deconstruction of Habermasian critical theory. Key Words: feminism Habermas identity moral vs ethical.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marianna Papastephanou (2012). Crossing the Divide Within Continental Philosophy: Reconstruction, Deconstruction, Dialogue and Education. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (2):153-170.
Barry F. Dainton (2004). Higher-Order Consciousness and Phenomenal Space: Reply to Meehan. Psyche 10 (1).
Calvin O. Schrag (1991). Reconstructing Reason in the Aftermath of Deconstruction. Critical Review 5 (2):247-260.
Johanna Meehan (2002). Review: Thoughts on William Rehg's "Insight and Solidarity". [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (3):387 - 396.
Johanna Meehan (2002). Thoughts on William Rehg's Insight and Solidarity. [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (3):387-396.
Johanna Meehan (1997). Interpretation and Social Science. [REVIEW] Human Studies 20 (4):429-440.
Johanna Meehan (2000). Feminism and Habermas' Discourse Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):39-52.
Johanna Meehan (2004). Review Essay: Feminism, Critical Theory, and Power. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):375-382.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,656 )
How can I increase my downloads?