Reply to lansanna Keita on “marxism and human sociobiology”
Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):453-456 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesL. D. Keita (2001). The Bell Curve and Heredity: A Reply to Hocutt and Levin. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):386-394.
Michael Levin & Max Hocutt (2001). Reply to Keita. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):395-403.
L. D. Keita (1997). Winch and Instrumental Pluralism a Reply to B. D. Lerner. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):80-82.
L. D. Keita (1996). Science and Ideology Via Development: A Reply to Kebede. Journal of Value Inquiry 30 (4):569-572.
Philip Kitcher (1986). The Transformation of Human Sociobiology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:63 - 74.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zhang Boshu (1987). Marxism and Human Sociobiology: A Comparative Study From the Perspective of Modern Socialist Economic Reforms. Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):463-474.
Lansana Keita (1990). Marxism and Human Sociobiology: A Reply to Zhang Boshu. Biology and Philosophy 5 (1):79-83.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
