Philosophical Studies 153 (3):417-434 (2011)
|Abstract||The logic of ‘being informed’ gives a formal analysis of a cognitive state that does not coincide with either belief, or knowledge. To Floridi, who first proposed the formal analysis, the latter is supported by the fact that unlike knowledge or belief, being informed is a factive, but not a reflective state. This paper takes a closer look at the formal analysis itself, provides a pure and an applied semantics for the logic of being informed, and tries to find out to what extent the formal analysis can contribute to an information-based epistemology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John MacFarlane (2000). What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal? Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Mark Jago (2006). Imagine the Possibilities: Information Without Overload. Logique Et Analyse 49 (196):345–371.
Carolyn Ells (2003). Foucault, Feminism, and Informed Choice. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3/4):213-228.
Avi Sion (1995). Judaic Logic. Lulu.com.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby (2006). Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the U.S. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):9 – 14.
Masaharu Mizumoto (2011). A Theory of Knowledge and Belief Change - Formal and Experimental Perspectives. Hokkaido University Press.
Sara Rachel Chant & Zachary Ernst (2007). Group Intentions as Equilibria. Philosophical Studies 133 (1):95 - 109.
Fred Adams (2010). Information and Knowledge à la Floridi. Metaphilosophy 41 (3):331-344.
Giuseppe Primiero (2009). An Epistemic Logic for Becoming Informed. Synthese 167 (2):363 - 389.
Added to index2010-02-27
Total downloads52 ( #20,449 of 556,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?