What's the point in Scientific Realism if we don't know what's really there?

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,672
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Michel Ghins (2005). Putnam and the God's Eye Point of View. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):235-243.
    Sami Pihlström (1996). Getting Ontologically Natural. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):247-256.
    Julia Friederike Göhner & Markus Seidel (2013). Promiscuous Objects, Hybrid Truth and Scientific Realism. In Marie Kaiser & Ansgar Seide (eds.), Philip Kitcher. Pragmatic Naturalism. ontos.
    Timothy D. Lyons (2009). Non-Competitor Conditions in the Scientific Realism Debate. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):65-84.
    James Ladyman & Don Ross (2007). Scientific Realism, Constructive Empiricism, and Structuralism. In James Ladyman (ed.), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    29 ( #42,361 of 549,068 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,252 of 549,068 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums