The Consequences of Individual Consumption: A Defence of Threshold Arguments for Vegetarianism and Consumer Ethics
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (4):396-411 (2011)
|Abstract||As a moral foundation for vegetarianism and other consumer choices, act consequentialism can be appealing. When we justify our consumer and dietary choices this way, however, we face the problem that our individual actions rarely actually precipitate more just agricultural and economic practices. This threshold or individual impotence problem engaged by consequentialist vegetarians and their critics extends to morally motivated consumer decision-making more generally, anywhere a lag persists between individual moral actions taken and systemic moral progress made. Regan and others press just this point against Singer's utilitarian basis for vegetarianism; recently Chartier criticizes act-consequentialist vegetarianism by identifying many factors weakening the connection between individual meat purchases and changes in animal production. While such factors are relevant to act-consequentialist moral reasoning, I argue, they need not defeat the act-consequentialist case for vegetarianism and consumer ethics. This is shown by offering a probabilistic account of the threshold issue and discussing the positive and negative role-modelling effects of our morally motivated dietary and consumer choices|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David T. Schwartz (2010). Consuming Choices: Ethics in a Global Consumer Age. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
David Detmer (2007). Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
William O. Stephens (1994). Five Arguments for Vegetarianism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):25-39.
Judith Schrempf & Guido Palazzo (2011). How to Create the Ethical Consumer. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:532-543.
Gary Chartier (2005). On the Threshold Argument Against Consumer Meat Purchases. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2):233–249.
Sam Fullerton, Kathleen B. Kerch & H. Robert Dodge (1996). Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behavior in the Market Place. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):805 - 814.
Eleni Papaoikonomou, Mireia Valverde & Gerard Ryan (2012). Articulating the Meanings of Collective Experiences of Ethical Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):15-32.
Joshua Colt Gambrel & Philip Cafaro (2010). The Virtue of Simplicity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):85-108.
Scott J. Vitell & Joseph G. P. Paolillo (2003). Consumer Ethics: The Role of Religiosity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):151 - 162.
Unni Kjærnes (2012). Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Consumer Choice in the European Politics of Food. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):145-162.
Debra R. Comer & Gina Vega (2005). An Experiential Exercise That Introduces the Concept of the Personal Ethical Threshold to Develop Moral Courage. Journal of Business Ethics Education 2 (2):171-197.
Krzysztof Saja (2013). The Moral Footprint of Animal Products. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (2):193–202.
Mei-Fang Chen, Ching-Ti Pan & Ming-Chuan Pan (2009). The Joint Moderating Impact of Moral Intensity and Moral Judgment on Consumer's Use Intention of Pirated Software. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):361 - 373.
Roger Paden (1996). Liberalism and Consumerism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (4):14-19.
Added to index2011-09-30
Total downloads53 ( #23,154 of 738,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,044 of 738,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?