Tolerance, secularism and culture: reply to Blum

Journal of Moral Education 39 (2):161-163 (2010)
In response to Lawrence Blum?s critique of my paper ?Education for tolerance?, I argue that the state should not use its control of schools and the content of teaching to impose a new and controversial interpretation of parenthood, nor to preempt parents? right to an education for their children that is consistent with their own religious and moral convictions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,022
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Wayne A. Davis (1993). Reply to Blum. Philosophia 22 (1-2):211-218.
Brenda Almond (1997). Counselling for Tolerance. Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):19-30.
Lawrence Blum (2003). Reply To Byrne And Silliman. Social Philosophy Today 19:249-252.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

29 ( #69,588 of 1,410,435 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #75,847 of 1,410,435 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.