Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (5):505 - 539 (2005)
|Abstract||This article discusses pragmatic aspects of our interpretation of intensional constructions like questions and prepositional attitude reports. In the first part, it argues that our evaluation of these constructions may vary relative to the identification methods operative in the context of use. This insight is then given a precise formalization in a possible world semantics. In the second part, an account of actual evaluations of questions and attitudes is proposed in the framework of bi-directional optimality theory. Pragmatic meaning selections are explained as the result of specific rankings of potentially conflicting generation and interpretation constraints|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Aloni (2008). Concealed Questions Under Cover. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):191-216.
Maria Aloni (2005). Individual Concepts in Modal Predicate Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (1):1 - 64.
Bas C. Fraassen (1979). Propositional Attitudes in Weak Pragmatics. Studia Logica 38 (4):365 - 374.
Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (1998). Questions in Dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (3):237-309.
Konrad Talmont-Kaminski (2005). Pragmatist Pragmatics: The Functional Context of Utterances. Philosophica 75.
Nathan Klinedinst & Daniel Rothschild (forthcoming). Exhaustivity in Questions with Non-Factives. Semantics and Pragmatics.
Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
R. Nelken & N. Francez (2002). Bilattices and the Semantics of Natural Language Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):37-64.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,349 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?