Report a bug on this page | Sign in | Create an account
 
PhilPapers home blank

Online research in philosophy


Entries: 207,589  New this week: 129
blank
 General search   Category finder 
advanced search | help | use + and * as usual.
Type words to match in category names
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.

  • William P. Alston (2005). Perception and Representation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):253-289.
    Representationalism in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: interscience.wiley.com ingentaconnect.com   | Scholar
    73 downloads  |  Added to index:2009-01-27  |  Mark as duplicate |  Delete from index


Discussion of William P. Alston, Perception and representation
Other forums | There are no threads in this forum | Start a new thread First post Latest post Total
Nothing in this forum yet.


Similar books and articles
  • 72.9David J. Chalmers, Robert M. French & Douglas R. Hofstadter (1992). High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy: A Critique of AI Methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence.
    AI Methodology in Philosophy of Cognitive Science
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 70.3Justin P. McBrayer (forthcoming). A Limited Defense of Moral Perception. Philosophical Studies.
    One popular reason for rejecting moral realism is the lack of a plausible epistemology that explains how we come to know moral facts. Recently, a number of philosophers have insisted that it is possible to have moral knowledge in a very straightforward way—by perception. However, there is a significant objection to the possibility of moral perception: it does not seem that we could have a perceptual experience that represents a moral property, but a necessary condition for coming to know that (...) X is F by perception is the ability to have a perceptual experience that represents something as being F . Call this the ‘Representation Objection’ to moral perception. In this paper I argue that the Representation Objection to moral perception fails. Thus I offer a limited defense of moral perception. (shrink)
    Moral Epistemology, Misc in Meta-Ethics
    The Experience of High-Level Properties in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 69.1J. Barry Maund (1995). Colours: Their Nature and Representation. Cambridge University Press.
    This book defends the radical thesis that no physical object has any of the colours we experience it as having.
    Color Realism in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this book  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 68.4Fred Dretske (2003). Experience as Representation. Philosophical Issues 13 (1):67-82.
    Representationalism in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: blackwell-synergy.com   | Scholar | More..
  • 67.7Tim Crane (ed.) (1992). The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge University Press.
    The nature of perception has long been a central question in philosophy. It is of central importance not just for the philosophy of mind, but also for epistemology, metaphysics, aesthetics, and the philosophy of science. This volume represents the best of the latest research on perception, with contributions from some of the leading philosophers in the area, including Christopher Peacocke, Brian O'Shaughnessy and Michael Tye. As well as discussing traditional problems, the essays also approach the topic in light of recent (...) research on mental content and representation. (shrink)
    The Contents of Perception, Misc in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this book  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: cambridge.org   | Scholar | More..
  • 66.3Arthur Still (1979). Perception and Representation. In Philosophical Problems In Psychology. London: Methuen.
    The Contents of Perception, Misc in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 66.1Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) (2006). Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press.
    In the last few years there has been an explosion of philosophical interest in perception; after decades of neglect, it is now one of the most fertile areas for new work. Perceptual Experience presents new work by fifteen of the world's leading philosophers. All papers are written specially for this volume, and they cover a broad range of topics dealing with sensation and representation, consciousness and awareness, and the connections between perception and knowledge and between perception and action. This will (...) be the book on the philosophy of perception, a fascinating resource for philosophers and psychologists. (shrink)
    No categories
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this book  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 65.1Eduard Marbach (1993). Mental Representation and Consciousness: Toward a Phenomenological Theory of Representation and Reference. Kluwer.
    The book makes a direct contribution to the connection between phenomenology and cognitive science.
    Semantic Theories in Philosophy of Language
    Consciousness and Intentionality in Philosophy of Mind
    Phenomenology and Consciousness in Philosophy of Cognitive Science
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this book  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 64.3D. L. C. Maclachlan (1989). Philosophy of Perception. Cliffs Prentice-Hall.
    Philosophy of Perception, General in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this book  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..
  • 64.1J. Barry Maund (1975). The Representative Theory of Perception. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (September):41-55.
    Sense-Datum Theories in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..




  • Applied ethicsEpistemologyMeta-ethicsMetaphysicsNormative ethics
    Philosophy of biologyPhilosophy of languagePhilosophy of mindPhilosophy of religionMore ...
    Home | Blog | New books and articles | Philosophy journals | Forums | The Categorization Project | About PhilPapers | Contact us
    Sponsored by the Joint Information Systems Committee as part of the
    Information Environment Programme

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by David Bourget and David Chalmers where applicable.

    loading ..