Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):311-330 (2005)
|Abstract||Do I have a special reason to care about my future, as opposed to yours? We reject the common belief that I do. Putting our thesis paradoxically, we say that nothing matters in survival: nothing in our continued existence justifies any special self-concern. Such an "extreme" view is standardly tied to ideas about the metaphysics of persons, but not by us. After rejecting various arguments against our thesis, we conclude that simplicity decides in its favor. Throughout the essay we honor Jim Rachels, whose final days exemplified his own unselfish morality as well as the “neutralist” ideal we espouse. As an appendix, we include the last original work to be published by James Rachels, in which he criticizes Sidgwick’s most famous defense of egoism|
|Keywords||Survival James Rachels Neutralism What Matters in Survival Personal Identity Derek Parfit Henry Sidgwick|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rebecca Roache (2010). Fission, Cohabitation and the Concern for Future Survival. Analysis 70 (2):256-263.
James Baillie (1993). What Matters in Survival. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):255-61.
Raymond Martin (1998). Self-Concern: An Experiential Approach to What Matters in Survival. Cambridge University Press.
Jim Stone (2005). Why There Still Are No People. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):174-191.
Jeremy Allen Byrd (2007). The Perfect Murder: A Philosophical Whodunit. Synthese 157 (1):47 - 58.
Scott Campbell (2005). Is Causation Necessary for What Matters in Survival? Philosophical Studies 126 (3):375-396.
Stuart Rachels -Torin Alter (2005). Nothing Matters in Survival. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):311-330.
Stuart Rachels & Torin Alter (2005). Nothing Matters in Survival. Journal of Ethics 9 (3/4):311 - 330.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #25,360 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?