'Potentia' as 'potestas': An interpretation of modern politics between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt
Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):231-252 (2010)
|Abstract||The present article discusses the relationship between might ( potentia ) and power ( potestas ) as it has unfolded throughout the modern age, from Thomas Hobbes to Carl Schmitt. Hobbes indicates the way forward for a progressive linguistic and conceptual coincidence of potentia and potestas : the goal of Hobbesian political philosophy (the search for peace and security) necessitates the reduction of potentia to potestas through the elimination of the content of actus . Schmitt accepts this reduction, by assigning priority to potestas : the image of modern technology as a privileged dimension of potentia—potestas comes together as the modern state. Instead of taking the route of potentia understood as an opening-up to new possibilities and as human self-affirmation, the language of potentia—potestas has triggered a process, which is that of a naturalization of power relations, that is based on and justified by the social inequality arising from the differing extent of ownership of the instruments of technological production|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Manlio Della Serra (2011). Note sull'onnipotenza divina nell'Opera di Agostino. Augustinianum 51 (1):147-160.
Etienne Balibar (2005). Potentia Multitudinis, Quae Una Veluti Mente Ducitur : Spinoza on the Body Politic. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Current Continental Theory and Modern Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Carlo Altini (2006). Hobbes in der Weimarer Republik. Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss Und Die Krise der Modernen Welt. Hobbes Studies 19 (1):3-30.
Kathrin Braun (2012). From the Body of Christ to Racial Homogeneity: Carl Schmitt's Mobilization of 'Life' Against 'the Spirit of Technicity'. The European Legacy 17 (1):1 - 17.
F. Ivanovic (2008). De Potentia Dei: Some Western and Byzantine Perspectives. The European Legacy 13 (1):1-11.
Rafał Wonicki (2008). Politics of Power and Freedom in the Thought of Schmitt and Arendt. In Svetozar Minkov & Piotr Nowak (eds.), Man and His Enemies: Essays on Carl Schmitt.
Johan Tralau (2010). Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt, and Three Conceptions of Politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2):261-274.
Carl Schmitt (1996/2008). The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. University of Chicago Press.
Alice Chapman (2004). Disentangling Potestas in the Works of St. Bernard of Clairvaux. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 60 (3):587 - 600.
Joseph A. Dane (1979). Potestas /Potentia: Note on Boethius's de Consolatione Philosophiae. Vivarium 17 (2):81-89.
Added to index2010-02-03
Total downloads62 ( #18,304 of 738,393 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,232 of 738,393 )
How can I increase my downloads?