Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 10 (1):15-30 (2000)
|Abstract||This paper explores the assumption of autonomy. Several arguments are presented against the assumption of runtime autonomy as a principle of design for artificial intelligence systems. The arguments vary from being theoretical, to practical, and to analytic. The latter parts of the paper focus on one strategy for building non-autonomous systems (the practice view). One critical theme is that intelligence is not located in the system alone, it emerges from a history of interactions among user, builder, and designer over a given set of data as mediated by the system. A second critical theme is that artificially intelligent systems are ongoing projects that must be continuously adapted and revised using joint person-machine efforts|
|Keywords||autonomy building systems users practice everyday activity artificial intelligence cognitive science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John J. Polder & Henk Jochemsen (2000). Professional Autonomy in the Health Care System. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):477-491.
Jean Keller (1997). Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics. Hypatia 12 (2):152-164.
Laurence Thomas (1983). Rationality and Moral Autonomy: An Essay in Moral Psychology. Synthese 57 (2):249 - 266.
Ioan Muntean & Cory D. Wright (2007). Autonomy, Allostasic Mechanisms, and AI: A Biomimetic Perspective. Pragmatics and Cognition 15:489–513.
John Collier, Autonomy in Anticipatory Systems: Significance for Functionality, Intentionality and Meaning.
Kyle Jennings (2010). Developing Creativity: Artificial Barriers in Artificial Intelligence. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (4):489-501.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,097 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?