|Abstract||Kania has recently developed an argument which poses a serious challenge to the â€œubiquity thesisâ€ â€“ the view that every literary narrative necessarily has a fictional narrator. Kania characterizes a fictional narrator as a (possibly non-human) agent who tells (or is responsible for) the narrative and who exists on â€œthe same..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Peter Lamarque (2004). On Not Expecting Too Much From Narrative. Mind and Language 19 (4):393–408.
Peter Kivy (2009). Fictional Form and Symphonic Structure: An Essay in Comparative Aesthetics. Ratio 22 (4):421-438.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2007). The Literary Origins of the Cinematic Narrator. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):76-94.
Peter Alward (2007). For the Ubiquity of Nonactual Fact-Telling Narrators. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):401–404.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2009). Cinematic Narrators. Philosophy Compass 4 (2):296-311.
George M. Wilson (2007). Elusive Narrators in Literature and Film. Philosophical Studies 135 (1):73 - 88.
Peter Alward (2009). That's the Fictional Truth, Ruth. Acta Analytica 25 (3):347-363.
Andrew Kania (2005). Against the Ubiquity of Fictional Narrators. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):47–54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?