Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 145 (2):235 - 255 (2009)
|Abstract||In this paper, I argue, contra Perry, that the existence of locating beliefs does not require the abandonment of the analysis of belief as a relation between subjects and propositions. I argue that what the "problem of the essential indexical" reveals is that a complete explanation of behaviour requires both an explanation of the type of behaviour the agent engaged in and an explanation of why she engaged in it in the circumstances that she did. And I develop an account of belief which encompasses both explanatory roles and which still treats belief as a two-place relation between subjects and propositions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eros Corazza (2004). Essential Indexicals and Quasi-Indicators. Journal of Semantics 21 (4):341-374.
John Perry (1993). The Problem of the Essential Indexical: And Other Essays. Oxford University Press.
Mark Textor (2001). 'Portraying' a Proposition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):137-161.
Desheng Zong (2011). Retention of Indexical Belief and the Notion of Psychological Continuity. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):608-623.
Moritz Schulz (2010). The Dynamics of Indexical Belief. Erkenntnis 72 (3):337 - 351.
John Perry (1979). The Problem of the Essential Indexical. Noûs 13 (December):3-21.
Peter Alward (2009). The Inessential Quasi-Indexical. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):235 - 255.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,927 of 752,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?