Sociological Theory 13 (3):209-228 (1995)
|Abstract||Why do sociological theorists remain uninterested in and resistant to feminist theory? Notwithstanding indications of increasing openness to feminist theory, journals and texts on sociological theory reflect a continuing pattern of neglect. I identify reasons for this pattern, including tensions resulting from the introduction of gender as a central analytical category: Not only does gender challenge the dichotomous categories that define sociology's boundaries and identity, it also displaces the discipline's central problematic of modernity. The significance of this displacement is apparent when the discipline's responses to feminist and postmodernist theory are compared. I discuss the relevance of feminist theoretical work to contemporary issues in sociological theory, with specific attention to the synthetic nature of feminist theorizing, to work on rethinking power, resistance, and oppression, and to efforts to effect a conceptual shift from "either/or" to "both/and" thinking and to establish new grounds for assessing knowledge claims|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Linda McDowell (1999). Gender, Identity, and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. University of Minnesota Press.
Claire Colebrook (2004). Gender. Palgrave Macmillan.
Penelope Deutscher (1997). Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy. Routledge.
Ann Garry (1992). Why Care About Gender? Hypatia 7 (summer):155-161.
Michèle Barrett & Anne Phillips (eds.) (1992). Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Stanford University Press.
Chrys Ingraham (1994). The Heterosexual Imaginary: Feminist Sociology and Theories of Gender. Sociological Theory 12 (2):203-219.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #39,311 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?