Graduate studies at Western
Foundations of Science 5 (2):157-184 (2000)
|Abstract||There are two classical and opposite positions about scientific discovery: the one that conceives scientific discovery activity as fully rational and the one that conceives scientific discovery activity as fully irrational. In the first case, machines are regarded as able to perform the scientific discovery process whereas, in the second case, machines are considered unable to perform any part of the scientific discovery process.We adopt a third intermediate approach that envisages a new role for machines, which are conceived as descriptions of the results of scientific discovery activity. More precisely, the purpose of the paper is to illustrate the multilevel structure of a machine, called creative dynamic agency, that represents the articulated and incremental description of the product of scientific discovery process. The multilevel architecture reflects the composition relation that holds among phenomena described by creative agents that compose creative dynamic agency|
|Keywords||creative agent creative dynamic agency field of phenomena mosaic of models multilevel insertion of models|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
W. Balzer (1991). Scientific Discovery, Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. Erkenntnis 34 (1):125-127.
Larry Briskman (1980). Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art. Inquiry 23 (1):83 – 106.
Lorenzo Magnani (2006). Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part I” The Rationality of Scientific Discovery: Abductive Reasoning and Epistemic Mediators. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 5 (2):213-228.
Herbert Simon (1995). Machine Discovery. Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.
Lorenzo Magnani (2004). Conjectures and Manipulations. Computational Modeling and the Extra- Theoretical Dimension of Scientific Discovery. Minds and Machines 14 (4):507-538.
Andrew Lugg (1985). The Process of Discovery. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):207-220.
Toby J. Sommer (2001). Suppression of Scientific Research: Bahramdipity and Nulltiple Scientific Discoveries. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):77-104.
James A. Marcum (2011). Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.
Mario Alai (2004). A.I., Scientific Discovery and Realism. Minds and Machines 14 (1):21-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,864 of 750,298 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 750,298 )
How can I increase my downloads?