Is a Fully General Theory of Knowledge Possible?
Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):307-322 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBaron Reed (2002). How to Think About Fallibilism. Philosophical Studies 107 (2):143-157.
Luciano Floridi (1993). The Problem of the Justification of a Theory of Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24 (2):205 - 233.
Luis Jiménez & Axel Cleeremans (1999). Fishing with the Wrong Nets: How the Implicit Slips Through the Representational Theory of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):771-771.
Matthew Chrisman (forthcoming). The Normative Evaluation of Belief and the Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions'. Journal of Philosophy.
Albert Casullo (2009). Analyzing a Priori Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):77 - 90.
N. M. Korkunov (1922/1968). General Theory of Law. New York, A. M. Kelley.
Mark Textor (2011). Knowing the Facts. Dialectica 65 (1):75-86.
Jordi Cat (2000). Must the Microcausality Condition Be Interpreted Causally? Theoria 15 (1):59-85.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-14Total downloads3 ( #201,838 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
